The economical and Moral dilemma of Fruit and Vegetables

This story is regarding the permission given to some, to provide ‘imperfect fruits and vegetables’.  Addressing some variables. Why it happens to foods, legislation which may of left nasty loop holes, that cause economic crisis and a rise in the cost of fresh foods. Which should not be occurring from this. It is supposed to be a simple, nice gesture to enable us to use more foods that have been produced with issues, for a lower price. That is all that is supposed to come from this being allowed to be sold.

Besides many growth techniques. We have the ‘it doesn’t look good’ dilemma. The Moral dilemma of, simply throwing something away.

This type of thinking is always dangerous, on it’s own. For you sweet people, we have an economical structure within that a failure rate that has seen the Morals, Ethics, business practices be thrown aside, in a bid to join one of the ‘new big things’.

This indeed is the dilemma itself.

Remember when reading this, I will not be ‘by passing’ facts, for feelings. That’s how bad things slip by.. One could say, like this one, if it’s not followed by the eyes of the authorities, it’s the cats job, which means it falls on the civilians lap…

It seems that it has finally been allowed, for us to have the right to choose, if we would like to eat a fruit or vegetable that are, damaged, unsightly. They apparently will become available in stores, chosen and placed in bags. Being in bags is a safety net and ‘greenies’ should not be complaining about it.

Damaged, unsightly… Which really means: dropped, not able to be sustained by the mother tree, left to winter, not enough sun, lacking in nutrition, or a genetic fault, bad seedlings.

Now, there is nothing wrong with baking an apple pie, desserts, with some damaged/neglected (not by deliberate act). But, to choose to eat them all of the time, I am sure we have a nutritional issue. To be forced, even today, in an explained market (economical) squeeze, it is neglect towards the human/animals. Unacceptable.

Let me explain, that I am a person that cuts around dark spots and a lover of fruits and vegetables. I do not believe we can live without them. However, I also believe in nutrition and a connection between foods and our health.

To allow any disturbance to the market place that will/could take advantage of this situation, in at least nutritional and or financial ways. I would feel betrayed. More so than when those foods were thrown away.

These are the choices, types of ideas that come up, through a greens view. Then we have the economical capitalism that can become extremely dangerous, if lawless behaviour ensues around innocent bills/legislation. Not being and or allowing the brutality of a full fledged criminals capitalist is how we survive. For they, will take, mindlessly until we have no air, no food, full of disease, perverted lifestyle with no end, even them themselves become impoverished with the lack of health of the lives beneath them, with the damage to all resources, they are left alone, to starve and to fall on their swords. Always be weary of these people. I’m trying to work out if it’s a mental defect. I know it’s lack of intelligence. There is a healthy balance. I see these unhealthy tactics working today. This is why our systems are crippling, as well as low work ethic, criminality and morale. People turning on people with in sectors and places of work, turning on the tax payers, turning on each other. Seen in ####### in the medical system, and other things, as simple as hairdressing. If people see lack of, they seem to go mad. If they don’t have straight up leadership they ‘fault’. Thereby ‘Lead by example’.

There is nothing wrong with all types of political structuring it is how you roll it out, the morals, ethics and legality that become the issues. There is one way to do most things.

Back to the story. The economical disaster that could easily possess our farmlands, and back pocket. Seeming as it is food, our very life.

Selling faulty Foods.

Issues:

Dumping; Businesses being set up to not care at all if the food is produced correctly, increasing the faulty foods, and wiping out our countries natural cultivation outlet. The  disbursing of damaged/couldn’t quite get there fruits/vege. This is alarming and it should be. This will impact the cost of the fruits. This will impact the health and welfare of all the people. (when i say people I mean rich to poor, unless i point either on out) Signs: Poor land purchases and failing turn out.

Taking over the naturally Marked/defected different fruits/vegetables. Wiping out the natural market. This is, you selling farmland to abusers, and or importing it. I would not allow an export company to set up a farm here, I would closely be watching the ones already happening. When seen fit and new ones/one has opened they should be kept a close eye on. For the soil, and growing on the land also needs to be protected. The soil, nutrition and care for the needed equipment would be lacking. Therefore, inhibiting next farmer, and causing damage to the land.

Dropping prices of damaged /  fruits and vegetables. Competes with normal fruits. As long as they are coming from the major sellers, there is no lose. If it starts to come from inferior places, or the trade increases through one of the constant suppliers, we would have a problem.

When the prices, or if, the prices of normal vegetables and fruits rise, considering also that they are selling their inferior product to us, this would be an unusual move. It means they they need an investigation. The result could show that they are taking extra money to cover the costs of the damaged fruits and vegies. Or even more nasty as an example. That they are buying out others/starting new farms not minding about the damaged foods; using their good name, increasing costs to cover that, while using the damaged food sales as some sort of justifiable equation of cost of foods. This hasn’t been set up for that at all, nor should it be.  These are criminal activities that would impact civilians our economy and or quality of land and production. Which means you need to find them, stop them, take their land and shut it down.

This is not a production line, this is selling the ‘rest’ of the product. This is not a business opportunity. It has nothing to do with people outside of the country, or new business. There fore if anything, the prices could actually drop. Remember to eat these in a balanced diet.

IF we do not watch out for the signs, this is will effect the ‘cost of living’, the ‘economy’, the market place. A deliberate act at this time, wether they are aware of the juicy content, is an attack on the economy.

It is also a terrible manner for any self professed farmer to consciously be. There is no excuse for the behaviour. It’s unethical business to allow this to interfere with the cost of living. It is DUMPING, and not of old goods but a purposeful act to undermine health, the economy of Australia. And any other country that chooses to do this. It is top of the line criminal. However, if a smaller farmer, or new farmer wants to add to the produce, in a statistical manner. Meaning on a normal growth failure rate system, it could be accepted.

However, if they are trying to reach the lowest denominator of food growth, they are being criminals. The evidence will be the employment ratio, the equipment, and their story. You do not incriminate a good man. The statistics have to run through the good peoples hands. The ones who know that just meeting a number doesn’t mean you are being ethical or lawful. And there needs to be justice there to slam down the hammer on ‘fakers’ ‘users’. Looks can be deceiving on the good and bad side of life. Hence why, Innocent until proven guilty. It’s about Intent.

Let’s remind ourselves why this happens to the foods. 1. The quality of soil 2. Bugs 3. Over poisoned, the tree could be using some of these as outlets of poison, example like the clustering of a cancer. 3. Not enough water, couldn’t reach the item. 4. Not able to see the sun. 5. Frost 6. Too much heat. 7. Bad Weather – Fallout in harvesting. Nutritional value: A,B,C Too high, Too low, sick.

Knowing that, do you thinks it’s more of a health reason to toss them away? Are we picking the right ones? Or was it a desperate greenies thing? Like the plastic bags. We now have them on many fruits and veggies.. to maintain a transference in the plastic market, for their economical stability. But, does any greenie care about that? I found it a trick move to do actually. Would like to know why, they increased plastic..

The people making up these protest ideas need to really think through their actions.

Conclusion and Research Questions below.

In addition, we really need to be making ways, making changes to increase organic foods. A Program I have made my notes on, to allow the diffusion of the toxins in soils today, a soil grading system. To allow famers to become organic over time.  Once again a den for criminals, I mean toxic providers, in this case. This doesn’t mean the allowance of  ‘toxified farm/residential lands residing beside toxic manufacturers.

It is about re cultivating and removing the pesticide from the farmlands. And toxic chemical people that are interfering with waterways and soils around farmlands, need to pay the farmers out. And residence of all types. Their enemy is themselves, no matter what they say they are killing their own families and selves.

It is in the pinnacle of capitalism. Where you will find some skitzoid greed. You would think with all the money, at least one of them would eventually become intelligent. But intelligence on that mindset is probably immense evil. They should have end of world plans for civilisation before being allowed to play god. And for the economy, for health care. But they bear no intelligence, or liability in there death cult. They too, are a little mentally defected, lacking. It is all workplace relations and the stock market, and slavery as a whole.

I have worked on the stabilisation of the stock market. It doesn’t need to ever collapse. However its not implemented. So this is were premature protests happen and if they action things they will collapse things. Because apparently only some of us are capable of filling the whole picture. We don’t need ups and downs in the system, if you think we do you are committing and accepting genocide, and i guarantee the effected people are a higher sentinel being than you, with what should be a requirement to breed and live in peace. We are talking about peoples ability to live in a home, eat, drink being all ignored by a cape of charities. While some dare to speak against those who have had their finances stolen from them, via stock market, insurance, lawyers, goods. This is mass current criminal behaviour that needs to end.

I believe scientifically there could be a test run to see the frequency of a viable or non viable piece of fruit. As a fruit has a seed, and seeds remain in a stat for a variable but stable/statistical amount of time.

Simply, the fruit has a heart beat that remains after it has left the tree. We freeze/keep very cool, fruits and vegetables. I believe if we took a closer look at the final process after the thaw/ could produce a better outcome for the fruit, in market. If we stabilise the cooling process better.          We cross a line in the cooling and when it thaws it doesn’t return to its natural stat. Usually hard. This is because you killed it. You supposed to be putting it too sleep or creating a hibernation. As I said ‘still alive’. Vegetables maintain a nice transfer if not directly effected by the ice. They did it to berries (however we have had production line health scares with them).

Fruits and vegetables maintain a life cycle after they are harvested.  This enables them to ‘breed’ to replant themselves and give us new life.    These seedlings need to be healthy and of the best quality to restart a new batch of growth. They’re excitable, they are creating energy. They give you energy when you eat them. The natural breakdown cycle is slower than our knives. And I have found TLC in cooking of all produce makes for better meals. Respecting foods is always beneficial. This also impacts, the if those people run a dodgy farm, the quality is full of hate, disdain. (I swear criminals are suicidal and want us to die with them, nut jobs)

 

Conclusion and Research Questions:

What precautions have been put in place to ensure someone doesn’t make a business out of this?

 

As we should be using and paying for MORE of the harvest. What is the contractual CAP. To ensure the dumping of ‘different fruit’ doesn’t over take the main market?

Causing prices of the normal fruit to rise. Contracts I believe would have to all be variable, and it would be about reaching a simple target, adding more when needed/able. But not to run off a base cap. Meaning, throwing the ‘different fruit’ away is a priority, to preserve the economy of the market place. To allow it to remain stable. At any time the the ‘different fruit’ may be removed from the market place. Has this been established? Always remember the government has the rights to take land, and there is no better person to take things from than a criminal. But let’s not make that the go to all of the time. For than you become neglectful in legislation and greedy, to the point that you’re stealing land, because you couldn’t do your jobs..

 

What research had been done on the fruits and vegetables before this discussion was made?

  • DNA, genetic mutations. (I for one am skeptical with the DNA testing I think there is some foundational sequence that may be missing, but it works for the main part, sometimes) Ensuring best seedlings continue.
  • Nutritional value (TEST: picked from variable places of the tree. A sequence of at least 3 per type i.e Lack of/dropped/spotted). I know that famers look at these things to ensure a fuller harvest, at least in the next season.
  • Environmental factors that caused the issue. Early/Late Harvest due to weather. The failure of a harvest due to weather, to force sell off of the ‘different fruits/vegies’ gives a feeling of obligation to do it all of the time, for the consumer, though not obligated to fail harvest, in fact that’s the issue I am addressing, to not purposely fail+. Size of business, than the dreaded running at a loss, full refund/default business… Having no forceable contract to take the damaged* goods, stops any law suits and protects the main asset. That is the healthy normal foods. People could take bigger environment risks, due to this. Which is inappropriate and on the side of lawlessness. (addition to what i mentioned above)
  • Chemicals – Accumulation in soil, trees, produce as a whole or secular. Type of chemicals used. Under this, check water usage, past and present. Going back as far as you choose. And watch after the inspection. For water can be like a drug. Inhibiting symptoms,giving a scientist a false reading under this subject. Charges are warranted here also. +Could be purposely harming the foods.
  • Care of Farm. The picking off of unhealthy pieces/inhibitors to growth and training fruits/vines is a necessary part of farming a healthy crop. This cannot be over looked due to the acceptance of selling the ‘different foods’. Another thing to address. It is very important. Those people would be going to start to damage the regrowth and soil, have dropping, and causing outbreaks. Aware farmers also should be wary of neighbouring farms trying to ride this pony of an idea to the bank.

I hope you understand why this is an issue. And I hope all these things are or /and have been addressed. What do you think?

 

Be wary of the loose minded ideas. They maybe small, sometimes huge. Either way there is one way to roll out ideas to the public. And that is not for approval. It is for the workers that work in ‘politics’, policy makers. To ensure they have covered every angle. Or WE DIE. It is that simple.

Pollution

It was a smart man who covered up the ‘look’ the dark stain of carbon toxicity. For we believe if we can’t see it, it isn’t there.

It is a stupid man who believes the toxic clusters are in demographical poorer areas. For it was the drop in the areas sales prices that enabled the purchases of the land. Some held onto for years. Farms were destroyed, lives were changed from all demographics changed. There are million dollar properties, schools and work places, hotels and incase you forget main cities, that surround these areas today. After the gutting was done. All done in the denial and zero care for the toxic ramifications. If you want to continue objection to that, how about the clusters that come from the most toxified areas, these clusters are segregated from the main system because it can not and will not digest the chemicals. For they have nothing to do with the natural system. Like cancers in the body.

These clusters are dragged around in systems in an attempt to break them down. You will notice the changed in on metre long areas to suburbs and infect one side of the plant to the other. While our live organism, our environment fights for its life. As do we.

The violence of storms is not without reason. It is with actual great intelligence. The force is to grab the food and water; Elements, (water, oxygen, nitrogen) Nutrition, to enable to cell construction that maintains us in the bubble. If it cannot fulfil the process, we do not have the privilege of an atmosphere. So instead of giving up, it fights, it tosses the soil, it creates fire, it waters the ground and it drinks again. While fighting CLUSTERS. While we complain about the weather. It is doing its job. If you look into it you can find some fantastic weather happenings. If you think of it as gathering food and water, and the process to enable it to do so. It is far more relatable.

Back burning, comes at a different unnatural time for the environment, it has either already passed through that cycle and/or is trying to start another one. And they set the land on fire. Somethings gotta give right? It is so abusive. It is so sad.

 

Should be Edited!! It took me a while to ‘edit’ after reading you may wonder why. This is because it wasn’t what was going on, since the memo.. If you play it on speech this may help you, as I usually write quite a lot. If you are as highly offended by spelling issues or even grammar as I am.. use speech, or read it, up to you. Can’t be that bad. You’re Welcome : )

 

 

Leave a comment